At-risk students

The term at-risk students is used to describe students who are "at risk" of failing academically, for one or more of any several reasons. The term can be used to describe a wide variety of students, including ones who belong to ethnic minorities, those who are academically disadvantaged, those who are disabled, those who are characterized by low socioeconomic status, and students on a probationary status.

Contents

History and characteristics

The term “at-risk” came into use after the 1983 article "A Nation at Risk", published by the National Commission on Excellence in Education. The article described United States society as being economically and socially endangered.[1] At-risk students are those students who have been labeled, either officially or unofficially, as being in danger of academic failure. In the U.S., different states define “at-risk” differently, so it is difficult to compare the varying state policies on the subject.

The National Center for Education Statistics lists the following factors that lead to an “at-risk” label for students:[2]

Students who are labeled as “at-risk” face a number of challenges that students not “at-risk” face. According to Becky Smerdon’s research for the American Institutes for Research, students, especially boys, with low socioeconomic status (and therefore more likely to be labeled “at-risk”) show feelings of isolation and estrangement in their schools.[4] Educational philosopher Gloria Ladson-Billings claimed in a 2006 speech that the label itself actually contributes to the challenges. Her view is that, “We cannot saddle these babies at kindergarten with this label and expect them to proudly wear it for the next 13 years, and think, ‘Well, gee, I don't know why they aren't doing good.’”[5]

Minority students are much more likely to be labeled “at-risk” than white students. In addition, minority students are more likely to be identified as having mental retardation. Drop-out rates are much higher for minorities, and the number of African American students that are college bound has plummeted.[6]

The problem of “at-risk” is not one that affects only the individuals labeled as such. Society as a whole is affected when such a large portion of the population is at-risk. Many of the approaches currently used to remediate at-risk students are attempts at a quick-fix. Such approaches are not a viable way to alleviate the problem that faces society.[7]

Remediation

It is necessary to identify at-risk students as soon as possible. Once a student has been identified, remediation can begin. Examples of remediation include the following: remediation programs, tutoring, child care services, medical care, substance abuse awareness programs, bilingual instruction, employment training, and close follow up procedures on truancy and absenteeism.[8] Schools also try to work with parents to help them learn ways to help their at-risk child.

Finally, the government is now recognizing that a decline in federal financial support and higher standards have been having a negative impact on at-risk students. Therefore, intervention programs that support school districts who are struggling to help their at-risk students as well as incentives for school districts who successfully help their at-risk students have been established.

At-risk programs

Title I is one of the largest federal programs in K-12 education. funded at more than $26.4 billion in the 2008 school year.

The Title I program sends money to school districts based on census counts of children from low-income families and children in several smaller categories, such as foster children, homeless children and those living in correctional institutions.

Most schools use the money to hire teachers, purchase supplies, and fund intervention programs to help the at-risk students. Many schools use the Title I program as reading intervention for struggling students.

Reading Rockets is another program that supports the needs of at-risk students.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ Placier, Margaret L. (1993). The Semantics of Policy Making: The Case of "At Risk." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2): 380.
  2. ^ Spring, J. (2010). American Education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  3. ^ Thornburg, K., Hoffman, S., & Remeika, C. (1991). Youth at Risk; Society at Risk. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 203.
  4. ^ Smerdon, B. (2002). Students' Perceptions of Membership in Their High Schools. Sociology of Education, 75(4): 290.
  5. ^ Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools.
  6. ^ Thornburg, K., Hoffman, S., & Remeika, C. (1991). Youth at Risk; Society at Risk. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 205.
  7. ^ Thornburg, K., Hoffman, S., & Remeika, C. (1991). Youth at Risk; Society at Risk. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 206.
  8. ^ Donnelly, Margarita (1987). At-Risk Students (ERIC Identifier: ED292172). ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Eugene, OR. Retrieved August 5, 2008.
  9. ^ http://www.readingrockets.org/

Bibliography

External links